Steele Process Partners

Make sure the right problem is the one getting worked on.

I'm a Salesforce Business Analyst, and implementation partners bring me in as their Root Cause Strategist. I find the things that never made it into the scoping conversation, under your name, so they get named while there is still time to do something about them.

Most of what goes wrong was decided before anyone wrote a line of code.

Decision ownership named up front. The process mapped as it actually runs, not just how it's described. The cause agreed on before a fix is proposed. The system correctly diagnosed instead of blamed by default. Confirm these, and the surprises that would have surfaced later get named while there is still time to do something about them.

What your team gets

A stronger position in competitive bidsA proposal built on confirmed pillars names what the client actually needs, so you are competing on substance rather than on price.
Margin protectedThe surprises that would have eaten your margin get named while there is still time to do something about them.
Senior staff freed to stay billableDedicated scoping capacity means the firm can take on more work, not less.
The expensive surprises surface earlierWhat was never decided gets named while it is still a conversation, instead of after it is built.
A growing reputation for clean deliveryAll of it invisible, under your name.

A Salesforce Business Analyst who works as your Root Cause Strategist. Not another name on the bench.

Partners bring me in at three moments. On a project you are still bidding, so the proposal names what the client actually needs and you win on substance instead of losing on price. On one already moving, so the problem gets found while it is still cheap, before it turns into rework. On one you already closed, so you find out whether what happened was a one-off or a pattern your next project is going to repeat. All of it runs under your name, your client never sees me, and the scope I find should be work your people get to bill. I work from a framework of nine core pillars, built from real, sourced situations, not a hunch, and I keep adding to it as new patterns show up. The work I know best is customer care and contact centers, service teams and case management, and violation and exception workflows. Mostly Service Cloud and case routing. It shows up across industries, so it is a starting point rather than a filter on who I'll work with.

What changes when the right problem is the one getting worked on

  • Every project has a named decision owner

  • Current state confirmed against how the process actually runs

  • Root cause agreed on before a fix is proposed

  • The system correctly diagnosed instead of blamed by default

  • Senior staff stay billable instead of absorbing unbilled scoping work

The nine pillars behind every clean Salesforce engagement

A working framework built from real, sourced situations, the most common patterns, not a claim that nothing else can go wrong.

1

Decision ownership is named before work starts

No unnamed decision stalls the build later.

2

The process is documented, not left to memory

The source of truth matches reality.

3

The cause gets agreed on before a fix is proposed

Fixes target the real problem, not the symptom.

4

Current state gets mapped before a fix is proposed

Scope reflects what actually happens today.

5

The system gets correctly diagnosed, not blamed by default

Salesforce is fixed only when it's actually broken.

6

Documentation actually resolves the issue, not just describes the steps

Knowledge is usable, not ornamental.

7

The real process runs through the system of record, not around it

Work happens where leadership expects it to.

8

Reporting drives the decision it was built for

Numbers lead to action, not more meetings.

9

Knowledge survives turnover and scale

The system keeps working when people move on.

The Right Problem Check applies four of these nine pillars to one specific project.

Real work, not theory

HOA Violation Workflow Optimization

Manual follow-up was turning a fixable process into avoidable fines.

Read the case study →

AI-Assisted Salesforce Case Routing Analysis

Customers were bouncing between teams, and the fix wasn't the routing rules.

Read the case study →

Start with a project you already closed. Thirty minutes, under your name, on work where you already know the ending.