HOA Violation Workflow Optimization
Manual follow-up was turning a fixable process into avoidable fines.
Read the case study →I'm a Salesforce Business Analyst, and implementation partners bring me in as their Root Cause Strategist. I find the things that never made it into the scoping conversation, under your name, so they get named while there is still time to do something about them.
Decision ownership named up front. The process mapped as it actually runs, not just how it's described. The cause agreed on before a fix is proposed. The system correctly diagnosed instead of blamed by default. Confirm these, and the surprises that would have surfaced later get named while there is still time to do something about them.
What your team gets
Partners bring me in at three moments. On a project you are still bidding, so the proposal names what the client actually needs and you win on substance instead of losing on price. On one already moving, so the problem gets found while it is still cheap, before it turns into rework. On one you already closed, so you find out whether what happened was a one-off or a pattern your next project is going to repeat. All of it runs under your name, your client never sees me, and the scope I find should be work your people get to bill. I work from a framework of nine core pillars, built from real, sourced situations, not a hunch, and I keep adding to it as new patterns show up. The work I know best is customer care and contact centers, service teams and case management, and violation and exception workflows. Mostly Service Cloud and case routing. It shows up across industries, so it is a starting point rather than a filter on who I'll work with.
Every project has a named decision owner
Current state confirmed against how the process actually runs
Root cause agreed on before a fix is proposed
The system correctly diagnosed instead of blamed by default
Senior staff stay billable instead of absorbing unbilled scoping work
Every project has a named decision owner
Current state confirmed against how the process actually runs
Root cause agreed on before a fix is proposed
The system correctly diagnosed instead of blamed by default
Senior staff stay billable instead of absorbing unbilled scoping work
A working framework built from real, sourced situations, the most common patterns, not a claim that nothing else can go wrong.
No unnamed decision stalls the build later.
The source of truth matches reality.
Fixes target the real problem, not the symptom.
Scope reflects what actually happens today.
Salesforce is fixed only when it's actually broken.
Knowledge is usable, not ornamental.
Work happens where leadership expects it to.
Numbers lead to action, not more meetings.
The system keeps working when people move on.
The Right Problem Check applies four of these nine pillars to one specific project.
Manual follow-up was turning a fixable process into avoidable fines.
Read the case study →Customers were bouncing between teams, and the fix wasn't the routing rules.
Read the case study →Start with a project you already closed. Thirty minutes, under your name, on work where you already know the ending.